NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:
· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
· Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
32
(32%)
– 35
(35%)
The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics with a detailed explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources.
28
(28%)
– 31
(31%)
The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics with an explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Includes: 2 peer-reviewed sources and 2 course resources.
25
(25%)
– 27
(27%)
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate or vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Includes: 1 peer-reviewed sources and 1 course resources.
0
(0%)
– 24
(24%)
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker or is missing.
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate and vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker or is missing.
Includes: 1 or fewer resources.
· Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts.
14
(14%)
– 15
(15%)
The presentation provides an accurate and detailed infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.
12
(12%)
– 13
(13%)
The presentation provides an infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.
11
(11%)
– 11
(11%)
The presentation provides an infographic related to the concepts of the presentation that is inaccurate or vague.
0
(0%)
– 10
(10%)
The infographic provided in the presentation related to the concepts of the presentation is inaccurate and vague, or is missing.
· Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ replies.
32
(32%)
– 35
(35%)
The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data.
28
(28%)
– 31
(31%)
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data.
25
(25%)
– 27
(27%)
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague or inaccurate.
0
(0%)
– 24
(24%)
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5
(5%)
– 5
(5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4
(4%)
– 4
(4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3.5
(3.5%)
– 3.5
(3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
0
(0%)
– 3
(3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100
Leave a Reply