Back to Module 4: Psychopharmacology of Psychosis and Mood Disorders
Mood Stabilizers Narrated Presentation
Mood stabilizers
are a cornerstone in the treatment of bipolar and related mood disorders, requiring careful consideration of neurobiology, pharmacologic mechanisms, and patient‑specific factors. For the psychiatric‑mental health nurse practitioner (PMHNP), selecting and managing these medications involves balancing efficacy with safety, tolerability, and long‑term outcomes across diverse clinical presentations.
This assignment will give you an opportunity to discuss the four traditional mood stabilizer medications and their implications of use for patients with a variety of factors, including special population considerations, FDA approval indications, and drug-to-drug interactions. You will consult evidence-based, scholarly sources to support your presentation.
Level 2: AI for Study and Planning Support
AI use is
required
and is to be used for brainstorming, outlining, or studying
You are fully responsible for the final work
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this assessment.
Required Resources
To prepare:
Review the Required Learning Resources.
Review indications and considerations for traditional mood stabilizer psychopharmacology treatments, including carbamazepine, lamotrigine, lithium, and valproate products.
The Assignment
Construct a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation with Voiceover narration discussing each of the four traditional mood stabilizer medications: carbamazepine, lamotrigine, lithium, and valproate products. Support your answers with five (5) evidence-based, peer-reviewed scholarly literature.
Note:
APA style format will apply.
Your PowerPoint slide presentation with Voiceover narration should include the following for each:
Proposed mechanism of action
Baseline assessment, laboratory considerations, and frequency of ongoing labs and assessments
Note:
Discuss the importance of assessment and labs.
Special population considerations (birth assigned gender, age, other medical comorbidity considerations)
FDA approval indications
Typical dosing with discussion on therapeutic endpoints for psychiatric use
Major drug–drug interaction considerations
For each of these medications, please review potential drug–drug interactions listed below. Consider alternative dosing schedules, clinical implications for the drug interactions, additional patient education needed, any additional monitoring recommended, or collaboration needed with other medical professions (such as, primary care providers)
Lamotrigine + Valproate
Lamotrigine + Rifampin
Valproate + Estrogen containing birth control
Valproate + Amitriptyline
Lithium + Furosemide
Lithium + Lisinopril
Carbamazepine + Lurasidone
Carbamazepine + Grapefruit juice
Discuss the ethical, legal, and social implications related to prescribing bipolar and other related mood-disorder diagnoses therapy for patients.
By Sunday of Week 8
Submit
by Sunday of Week 8.
You must also submit a completed
AI Assessment Template
document, found in this Assessment’s Learning Resources.
Submission Information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
Turnitin Drafts
from the
Start Here
area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your
PowerPoint slide presentation with Voiceover narration
Assignment as
MD4AssgnPT1_LastName_FirstInitial.
Save your AI Assessment as
MD4AssgnPT2_LastName_FirstInitial.
Then, click on
Start Assignment
near the top of the page.
Next, click on
Upload File
and select your
PowerPoint slide presentation with Voiceover narration
.
Next, click on the
+ Add Another File
button and upload your AI Assessment.
Finally, click on
Submit Assignment
for review.
Rubric
NURS_6630_Module4_Assignment _Rubric
NURS_6630_Module4_Assignment _Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PowerPoint presentation discusses each of the four traditional mood stabilizer medications: carbamazepine, lamotrigine, lithium, and valproate and a proposed mechanism of action for each as well as baseline assessments, laboratory considerations, and the frequency of ongoing labs and assessments.
20
to >
17.88
pts
Excellent
Provides a fully developed discussion of the four traditional mood stabilizer medications, a proposed action for each, and baseline assessments, laboratory consideration, and the frequency of ongoing labs and assessments.
17.88
to >
15.88
pts
Good
Provides an adequately developed discussion of the four traditional mood stabilizer medications, a proposed action for each, and baseline assessments, laboratory consideration, and the frequency of ongoing labs and assessments.
15.88
to >
13.88
pts
Fair
Provides a minimally developed discussion of the four traditional mood stabilizer medications, a proposed action for each, and baseline assessments, laboratory consideration, and the frequency of ongoing labs and assessments.
13.88
to >
0
pts
Poor
Does not provide a discussion of each of the four traditional mood stabilizer medications, a proposed action for each, and baseline assessments, laboratory consideration, and the frequency of ongoing labs and assessments.
20
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Drug-Drug interaction, dosing schedules, and clinical implications for the drug interactions are considered and any additional patient education, recommended monitoring, and collaboration with other medical professionals are noted.
10
to >
8.94
pts
Excellent
Provides a fully developed analysis of drug interactions, dosing schedules, and clinical implications, along with patient consideration and recommendations for monitoring and collaboration with other medical professionals.
8.94
to >
7.94
pts
Good
Provides an adequately developed analysis of drug interactions, dosing schedules, and clinical implications, along with patient consideration and recommendations for monitoring and collaboration with other medical professionals.
7.94
to >
6.94
pts
Fair
Provides a minimally developed analysis of drug interactions, dosing schedules, and clinical implications, along with patient consideration and recommendations for monitoring and collaboration with other medical professionals.
6.94
to >
0
pts
Poor
Does not provide an analysis of drug interactions, dosing schedules, and clinical implications, along with patient consideration and recommendations for monitoring and collaboration with other medical professionals.
10
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
The presentation discusses the ethical, legal, and social implications related to prescribing bipolar and other related mood-disorder diagnoses therapy for patients.
10
to >
8.94
pts
Excellent
Provides a fully developed discussion of the ethical, legal, and social implications related to prescribing bipolar and other related mood-disorder diagnoses therapy.
8.94
to >
7.94
pts
Good
Provides an adequately developed discussion of the ethical, legal, and social implications related to prescribing bipolar and other related mood-disorder diagnoses therapy.
7.94
to >
6.94
pts
Fair
Provides a minimally developed discussion of the ethical, legal, and social implications related to prescribing bipolar and other related mood-disorder diagnoses therapy.
6.94
to >
0
pts
Poor
Does not provide a discussion of the ethical, legal, and social implications related to prescribing bipolar and other related mood-disorder diagnoses therapy for patients.
10
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
The presentation is supported by five (5) evidence-based, peer reviewed scholarly articles.
10
to >
8.94
pts
Excellent
Uses 5 evidence-based, peer-reviewed articles.
8.94
to >
7.94
pts
Good
Uses 3 evidence-based, peer-reviewed articles.
7.94
to >
6.94
pts
Fair
Uses 1 evidence-based, peer-reviewed article.
6.94
to >
0
pts
Poor
Does not use evidence-based, peer-reviewed articles.
10
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Professionalism and Design
15
to >
13.41
pts
Excellent
Presentation is consistently professional, well designed, and easy to follow… Visuals consistently complement the content.
13.41
to >
11.91
pts
Good
Presentation is mostly professional, well designed, and easy to follow… Visuals mostly complement the content.
11.91
to >
10.41
pts
Fair
Presentation is minimally professional. Some parts are poorly designed and difficult to follow… Visuals are poorly designed and/or do not complement content in some sections.
10.41
to >
0
pts
Poor
Presentation is disorganized, unclear, or incomplete… Visuals are distracting, confusing, or do not complement the content.
15
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Speaker Delivery in Voiceover Narration
15
to >
13.41
pts
Excellent
Speaker delivery is consistently engaging and clear.
13.41
to >
11.91
pts
Good
Speaker delivery is mostly engaging and clear.
11.91
to >
10.41
pts
Fair
Speaker delivery is minimally engaging. Some sections lack clarity.
10.41
to >
0
pts
Poor
Speaker delivery is unclear or incomplete.
15
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Source Attribution and APA Formatting
10
to >
8.94
pts
Excellent
All sources are cited in APA format without any errors… All images from sources include proper attribution without APA formatting errors.
8.94
to >
7.94
pts
Good
All sources are cited in APA format with some minor errors… All images from sources include proper attribution with minor APA formatting errors.
7.94
to >
6.94
pts
Fair
All sources are cited with frequent APA formatting errors… All images from sources include improper attribution with frequent APA formatting errors
6.94
to >
0
pts
Poor
Excludes source citations or shows minimal adherence to APA formatting rules… All images from sources lack attribution.
10
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Grammar, Mechanics, and Punctuation
10
to >
8.94
pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
8.94
to >
7.94
pts
Good
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few errors.
7.94
to >
6.94
pts
Fair
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with frequent errors.
6.94
to >
0
pts
Poor
Post contains frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that interfere with comprehension.
10
pts
Total Points:
100
Leave a Reply