population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeframe (PICOT) question Planning for the Dissemination of Research Findings PowerPoint

population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeframe (PICOT) question Planning for the Dissemination of Research Findings PowerPoint

Using the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeframe (PICOT) question developed in Week 2 and the research study you selected for the Week 3 or Week 4 discussion, select a method to plan the dissemination of research findings through a PowerPoint. This assignment encompasses the planning for dissemination through the completion of the selected template but does not require an oral presentation. (Template Uploaded)

-Answer each question in your own words on the selected Planning for the Dissemination of Research Findings template.

-Do not copy and paste information from the research study into the template.

-Correctly cite and reference the research study when paraphrasing it to answer questions on the Planning for the Dissemination of Research Findings template.

-Follow rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scientific writing.

**Article Link attached at bottom of Quantitative Research Essay**

Section 1: PICOT Question

Explain the clinical nursing practice problem you selected in Week 2.

State the PICOT question you developed.

Discuss the search strategy used to find research evidence.

Section 2: Research Evidence Design

Introduce your selected research study and discuss how it supports the PICOT question.

Explain the research design and methodology used in the study.

Discuss the participants, data collection methods, and data analysis.

Section 3: Research Evidence Results and Discussion

Explain the research results.

Display the results using a visual aid such as a graph, chart, or table.

Discuss how the results from this study answer the PICOT question.

Section 4: Critique of Evidence

Discuss your overall critique of the evidence.

What were the strengths of the study?

What were the weaknesses or limitations of the study?

Section 5: Application to Practice

Explain how the study contributes to the existing body of knowledge.

Discuss any potential challenges or barriers to implementing these findings.

Propose recommendations for integrating the evidence into clinical practice.

 

population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeframe (PICOT) question Planning for the Dissemination of Research Findings PowerPoint

Directions:

1.Using the PICOT question developed in Week 2 and the research study you selected for the Week 3 or Week 4 discussion, complete each section of the Planning for the Dissemination of Research Findings PowerPoint template.

2.This assignment encompasses the completion of the template but does not require an oral presentation.

3.Click into the box to the right to add your name and date.

4.Click on the next slide.

5.Find and click the word Notes at the bottom right of your PowerPoint screen.

6.On each side, in the Notes section, add speaker notes by answering each section with explanation and detail.

7.On the PowerPoint slide, click where it says [TYPE HERE], remove the words [TYPE HERE], and provide the key information for each section.

8.The PowerPoint slides should contain highlighted information from the speaker notes.

 

population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeframe (PICOT) question Planning for the Dissemination of Research Findings PowerPoint

PICOT Question

Selected clinical nursing practice problem

The Efficacy of CGM on glycemic control and diabetes management

PICOT question

In adults with uncontrolled diabetes (P), how does the implementation of a CGM (I) compared to the standard of care related to measuring blood sugar (C) affect glycemic control, as measured by HbA1c levels (O) over a 6-month period (T)?

Search strategy used to find research evidence.
Selecting the specific search terms

Using Boolean operators

Using subject headings

Using keywords

The selected clinical practice problem was about the efficacy of using CGM on glycemic control and in managing diabetes patients. The PICOT question was perfectly established in evaluating the use of CGM in measuring blood sugar over a period of 6 months. The search strategy that helped in coming up with the right articles for the study included identifying the exact phrases and trams from the PICOT question. In addition, the use of Boolean operators including ‘AND’, and ‘OR’ was effective in connecting important keywords into meaningful search terms.

 

Research Evidence Design

Research the study

The importance of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in managing diabetes mellitus

Design and methodology

The study used retrospective study design

The target of this analysis was to assess the clients’ insulin regimens

25 participants were used in this study

PLACE YOUR ORDER HERE

P
articipants
, data collection methods, and data analysis.

The data was collected using the: Clinic’s electronic health records

Real-time Dexocom clarity database

The patient with an Android and iPhone were given a share code

Patients without smartphones, the data was retrieved from the clinical records

The research study aims to explore the importance of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in managing diabetes mellitus. The study used retrospective study design. The study design used patients who were using the CGM systems and examined them every month. The study used a cohort of 25 patients with uncontrolled diabetes receiving treatment at the clinic. The target of this analysis was to assess the clients’ insulin regimens that were adjusted with regard to rea-time blood glucose readings. The data was collected using the clinic’s electronic health records and the real-time Dexocom clarity database. The patient with an Android and iPhone were given a share code that helped in tracking their blood glucose. For patients without smartphones, the data was retrieved from the clinical records.

Research Evidence Results and Discussion

Research results.

Results show SMBG to CGM devices brought about improved glycemic control Before CGM, the levels of HbAIc were 11.21%

7.04% while using CGM.

Findings about glycemic control rates while using SMBG and CGM

SMBG

11.21%

CGM

7.04%

Results to PICOT question

Positive impacts of using CGM devices towards enhancing glycemic Improved outcomes for patients with diabetes

Results show that the change from SMBG to CGM devices brought about improved glycemic control. For example, before the use of CGM, the levels of HbAIc were at 11.21% which drastically improved to about 7.04% while using CGM. The results highlight and answer the PICOT question since there were positive impacts of using CGM devices towards enhancing glycemic control hence its importance on improving the outcomes for patients with diabetes over the six months period.

 

Critique of Evidence

Critique of the evidence

The evidence can be generalized to other clinical practices The outcomes show the need for CGM to decide on monitoring blood sugar levels

The importance of smartphones and digital technologies health

Strengths of the study

Patients during this study were able to eliminate their reliance on insulin therapy

Limitations of the study

Lacked a control group

Limited sample size

Short duration for the follow-up

The evidence provided across the study is credible and valid and can be generalized to other clinical practices. The outcomes were significant and brought to light the need for CGM to decide on monitoring blood sugar levels over traditional methods. The importance of smartphones and digital technologies are becoming an important tool in helping improve the outcomes of patients suffering from diabetes. The strengths of the study included the fact that three patients during this study were able to eliminate their reliance on insulin therapy. The outcome of the study also brings into focuses the importance of CGM in controlling blood sugar levels. The limitations of this study are that it lacked a control group, had a limited sample size and also there was only a short duration for the follow-up.

Application to Practice

Study contributes to the existing body of knowledge

Highlights the efficacy of CGM on glycemic control Real-world application to clinical practices

Challenges to implementing these findings

Difficult to generalize of the results

Disadvantage to persons without smartphones

R
ecommendations

Need for better training and education of clinicians and the patients

The findings of this study perfectly add to the assisting body of knowledge by highlighting the efficacy of CGM in capitalizing on glycemic control and its usefulness in the real world across every clinical practice. The barriers to this study that might affect its implementation is the generalizable of the results to patients suffering from diabetes with regard to age, gender, and socioeconomic status. This is because, in most instances, persons without smartphones and advanced technologies might be disadvantaged during implementation. There is a need for better training and education of both the clinicians and the patients suffering from diabetes about the importance of CGM in improving the overall outcomes and its ability to control the blood glucose levels.

 

Reference

Manov, A. E., Chauhan, S., Dhillon, G., Dhaliwal, A., Antonio, S., Donepudi, A., Jalal, Y. N., Nazha, J., Banal, M., & House, J. (2023). The effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring devices in managing uncontrolled diabetes mellitus: A retrospective study. 
Cureus
.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42545

 

population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeframe (PICOT) question Planning for the Dissemination of Research Findings PowerPoint

The PICOT question developed to answer the clinical inquiry on the efficacy of CGM on glycemic control and diabetes management is; In adults with uncontrolled diabetes (P), how does the implementation of a CGM (I) compared to the standard of care related to measuring blood sugar (C) affect glycemic control, as measured by HbA1c levels (O) over a 6-month period (T)?

A quantitative study by was identified to help address the PICOT question.  The article “The Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in Managing Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus” aims to evaluate the effect of CGM in diabetes management by evaluating for differences in glycemic control levels such as (HbA1c) levels, and glucose level (Manov et al., 2023). The study is quantitative as it utilized a retrospective study design where numerical data will be analyzed in establishing the effectiveness of CGM through improvement in glycemic level and related health outcomes.  “Quantitative evidence provides statistical data that can be used to inform nursing practice, proving the effectiveness of nursing interventions.” (Chamberlain, 2025)

The researchers used the retrospective cohort study method, investigating electronic health records of patients who applied continuous glucose monitoring devices. The data was extracted from medical charts, with special attention to glycemic control indicators such as HbA1c (Manov et al., 2023). This approach is sufficient in assessing the efficiency of CGM devices since it makes it possible to analyze previously obtained data. The sample consisted of adults with uncontrolled diabetes; this is appropriate given the objective of the study-that is, investigating the impact of CGM on this very population.  One thing that would be interesting to explore would be to differentiate Type 1 & Type 2.  There isn’t a ton of available research on the efficacy of CGM with patients with Type 2.

This study demonstrated that CGM significantly improved glycemic control, as reflected by lower HbA1c levels and more stable glucose readings compared to self-monitoring. The findings established with the research is important in nursing as it demonstrates the effect of these devices in diabetes management (Manov et al., 2023). This has the potential to improve patient outcomes and decrease complications associated with diabetes. Nurses can incorporate the use of CGM when developing care plans to better manage the disease. Recommendation is to have studies that are larger, with more diverse groups, longer follow-up, and evaluation of cost-effectiveness.

 

References

Chamberlain University College of Nursing. (2025) 
NR-439
 
Week 4: Quantitative Research [
Online lesson]. (n.d.). 
https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/164135/pages/week-4-quantitative-research?module_item_id=23440921

Manov, A. E., Chauhan, S., Dhillon, G., Dhaliwal, A., Antonio, S., Donepudi, A., Jalal, Y. N., Nazha, J., Banal, M., & House, J. (2023). The effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring devices in managing uncontrolled diabetes mellitus: A retrospective study. 
Cureus
.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42545

population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeframe (PICOT) question Planning for the Dissemination of Research Findings PowerPoint