Walden University NURS-6050 Week 2: Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet

Written by

in

Walden University NURS-6050 Week 2: Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet

Agenda Comparison Grid Assignment Template for Part 1 and Part 2

 
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

Use this Agenda Comparison Grid to document information about the population health/healthcare issue you selected and the presidential agendas. By completing this grid, you will develop a more in depth understanding of your selected issue and how you might position it politically based on the presidential agendas.

You will use the information in the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid to complete the remaining Part 2 and Part 3 of your Assignment.

Identify the Population Health concern you selected.

People residing in America regardless of social status, race, ethnicity and age

Opioid epidemic

 

Describe the Population Health concern you selected.

The opioid epidemic has been experienced in most parts of the world, including the United States. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (2022), the opioid crisis is currently characterized by a high prevalence of mortality related to the use of illicit synthetic opioids like fentanyl. For instance, approximately 108,000 individuals in America succumbed to drug-related overdose from both prescription and illicit drugs with 73 838 deaths were associated with fentanyl (National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2022). Some of the opioid use long-term side effects include sleep-disordered breathing, chronic constipation, and increased bone fracture risks al Institute on Drug Abuse, 2022). Hence, as the opioid epidemic continues to rise, all stakeholders must incorporate an evidence-based and pragmatic approach to save lives, reduce risks, and remove barriers that hinder effective interventions Walden University NURS-6050 Week 2: Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet.

 

Administration (President Name)

President Joe Biden Administration

President Donald Trump Administration

Explain how each of the two presidential administrations approached the issue.

President Joe Biden’s administration has taken the opioid epidemic issue seriously and has incorporated it into the Unity Agenda. The reason why the president decided to tackle the issue is because of the effects that opioid trafficking and use have on families, particularly in blue and red communities and other communities as well (The White House, 2022). As a result, under President Biden’s leadership, the rate of opioid poisoning and deaths have reduced even though these deaths continue to be unaccepted since most are due to fentanyl. The President’s efforts include his administration trying to sign the Consolidated Appropriations Act into law since the law aimed at classifying fentanyl and its related substances to fit in the Controlled Substances Act as Schedule I substances.

 

During Donald Trump’s administration, the first step to curbing the opioid epidemic was declaring the epidemic as a public health emergency. The administration also proposed strategies to enhance and enforce the crisis by ensuring the affected individuals can access treatment, recovery, and prevention services (Grogan et al., 2020). The strategies also focused on ensuring that overdose-reversing drugs were available, including ways they would be distributed. The President also launched efforts to educate the community on the dangers of overdosing, which was one factor that led to an opioid prescription decrease of 31 percent in 2017 (Grogan et al., 2020). The reason was that the administration was targeting the opioid distributors to prevent them from fueling the opioid harm and epidemic in the American communities.

 

Identify the allocations of resources that the current and previous presidents dedicated to this issue.

For President Joe Biden in 2022, the administration awarded the Territories and States $1.5 billion in 2023 to address the opioid and addiction crisis. Also, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) enabled the awarding of $1.5 billion to the U.S Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that would increase support of territories, tribal lands, and State’s efforts in addressing the opioid crisis and support recovering individuals (SAMHSA, 2024). Also, in 2024, the administration has set aside about $1.48 billion for the District of Columbia, territories, and states, and $63 million for Tribes to address the opioid crisis.

 

Also, President Trump’s administration provided $1.8 billion in grants that would help in addressing the public health emergency crisis to prevent losing more Americans to overdose. Also, in 2018, the President Trump administration set 12.1 billion for opioid prevention and treatment efforts, with $15.6 billion for interdiction, law enforcement, and international initiatives (CMS, 2019). Other considerations in 2018 were the $500 million used for state grants under the CURES Act authorization to enhance access to treatment, recovery, and prevention services and minimize opioid misuse.

 

 

 

 

ORDER YOUR ASSIGNMENT HERE

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis

 

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, complete the following to document information about the population health/healthcare issue you selected

Administration

 

Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency the most helpful?

 

The administrative agency that would be crucial in addressing the opioid epidemic is the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the Food and Drug Administration (2024), the FDA is still committed to addressing the opioid crisis in all measures, particularly in medical product innovation, since it will limit new opioid addiction and abuse cases and in treating people living with an addiction. For instance, in 2018, the FDA started an innovation challenge that aimed at enhancing medical device development, including mobile medical applications and diagnostic tests to combat the crisis while enhancing opioid use disorder treatment and prevention (Food and Drug Administration, 2024). Walden University NURS-6050 Week 2: Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet

Also, the FDA approved new drugs through rigorous product reviews that highlighted their specific risks and benefits. Such considerations are necessary during opioid cases since the drugs must be assessed on the risks they pose to the patient, such as addiction and dependency.

How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?

President Joe Biden has incorporated the opioid epidemic in his Unity Agenda, thus showing the emergency state of the health issue. Hence, the only factor remaining is ensuring that the health issue remains part of the presidential agenda. Some of the strategies to boost the opioid epidemic in the Unity Agenda is by reaching out to the legislative through the nursing professional organization to present evidence-based research on why the opioid crisis fight should continue (The White House, 2022). That is evident in the statistics conducted in 2022 by the CDC, which shows that the rate of synthetic opioid deaths between 2021 and 2022 increased by 4.1 percent despite other rates like semisynthetic, heroin, and methadone being reduced (The White House, 2022). Also, it would be crucial to mobilize the communities with high mortality and morbidity rates to air their grievances to enable the federal, local, and state governments to formulate better means to intervene on the issue, especially in creating awareness.

 

Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected? An example is Michael J. Fox a champion for Parkinson’s disease.

The champion that would be crucial in the fight against the opioid epidemic is Andrea Joy Campbell, who is the Attorney General of Massachusetts. That is because she started a fight against the opioid epidemic after Massachusetts witnessed over 2,000 individuals succumbing due to opioid overdose (Zang et al., 2021). Therefore, she can help in reaching out to other leaders to embrace policies and laws that might help the country fight the opioid epidemic entirely.

 

 

Fact Sheet

The fact sheet will address why the opioid crisis serves as a vital legislation agenda and the nurses’ role in its agenda-setting.

Why Opioid Crisis Serves as a Vital Legislation Agenda

The opioid crisis affects the well-being of all individuals regardless of their gender, race, or ethnicity particularly those that rely on opioids to minimize chronic illness.

In 2022, there were approximately 108,000 individual deaths in America due to prescription and illicit drug overdose, with about 73,838 deaths associated with synthetic opioids, specifically fentanyl (National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2022).

Reasons for Addressing the Opioid Crisis

In 2024, the President Biden administration set aside about $1.48 billion to help the District of Columbia, territories, and states address the opioid crisis, while Tribes were awarded $63 million proving the cost the health issue has imposed to the country (The White House, 2022)

 Since mortality continues to increase, it is necessary to formulate appropriate strategies that incorporate all stakeholders, including the federal, state, and local governments and community members.

Managing Opioid Crisis

President Joe Biden’s administration has incorporated the opioid crisis into the Unity Agenda.

 

The Nurses’ Role in Its Agenda Setting

The primary role that nurses have towards agenda setting include;

Opioid Use Disorder Identification and Prevention

Nurses spend most of their time in practice interacting with the patient, thus they can use the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) for evidence purposes and then utilize patient education to educate the patient and formulate effective treatment and condition management process (Grogan et al., 2020).

Prescription Monitoring

The best way that nurses can monitor patient prescriptions is by regularly assessing the symptoms to prevent instances where patients with chronic conditions like cancer become addicted to opioids.

Advocacy

Nurses’ major role is advocacy to fight for patient rights. According to Van-Cleave et al. (2021), nurses can participate in the policy-making process, provide evidence-based research to back the proposed policies and laws to curb the opioid crisis and identify better standards for opioid prescription.

 
References

CMS. (2019).
Trump Administration takes Steps to Expand Access to Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder | CMS
. Www.cms.gov. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/trump-administration-takes-steps-expand-access-treatment-opioid-use-disorder

Food and Drug Administration. (2024).
Overdose Prevention Activities Timeline
. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/food-and-drug-administration-overdose-prevention-framework/timeline-selected-fda-activities-and-significant-events-addressing-substance-use-and-overdose#:~:text=On%20March%2022%2C%20FDA%20announced

Grogan, C. M., Bersamira, C. S., Singer, P. M., Smith, B. T., Pollack, H. A., Andrews, C. M., & Abraham, A. J. (2020). Are Policy Strategies for Addressing the Opioid Epidemic Partisan? A View from the States.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
,
45
(2), 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8004886

National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2022, January 20).
Overdose Death Rates
. National Institute on Drug Abuse. https://nida.nih.gov/research-topics/trends-statistics/overdose-death-rates#:~:text=Overall%2C%20drug%20overdose%20deaths%20rose

SAMHSA. (2024, May 2).
Biden-Harris Administration Announces Critical More Than $1.5 Billion State and Tribal Opioid Response Funding Opportunities
. Www.hhs.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2024/05/02/biden-harris-administration-announces-critical-more-than-1.5-billion-state-tribal-opioid-response-funding-opportunities.html

The White House. (2022, September 23).
Biden-Harris administration announces new actions and funding to address the overdose epidemic and support recovery
. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/09/23/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-new-actions-and-funding-to-address-the-overdose-epidemic-and-support-recovery/

Van-Cleave, J. H., Booker, S. Q., Powell-Roach, K., Liang, E., & Kawi, J. (2021). A Scoping Review of Nursing’s Contribution to the Management of Patients with Pain and Opioid Misuse.
Pain Management Nursing
,
22
(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2020.11.007

Zang, X., Macmadu, A., Krieger, M. S., Behrends, C. N., Green, T. C., Morgan, J. R., Murphy, S. M., Nolen, S., Walley, A. Y., Schackman, B. R., & Marshall, B. D. (2021). Targeting community-based naloxone distribution using opioid overdose death rates: A descriptive analysis of naloxone rescue kits and opioid overdose deaths in Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
The International Journal on Drug Policy
,
98
, 103435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103435 Walden University NURS-6050 Week 2: Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet

 

Walden University NURS-6050 Week 2: Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet

Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet

It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration.

Tip: 
You can locate presidential agenda information by searching Google for your health topic and the president. For example,
 mental health Obama presidential agenda
.

Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous).

Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.

Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment
.

The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources.

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected.

Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue.

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected and why is this agency the most helpful for the issue?

How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?

An entrepreneur/champion/sponsor helps to move the issue forward. Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected and why would this person be a good entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor? An example is Michael J. Fox is champion for Parkinson’s disease.

Part 3: Fact Sheet

Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page fact sheet that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:

Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

Assignment document should include:

Title page

Introductory paragraph

Agenda comparison grid and analysis

Fact sheet

Summary/conclusions

References

By Day 7 of Week 2

Submit
 your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts
 from the 
Start Here
 area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
WK2Assgn+LastName+Firstinitial

Then, click on 
Start Assignment
 near the top of the page.

Next, click on 
Upload File
 and select 
Submit Assignment
 for review.

Rubric

NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part 1: Agenda Comparison GridExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue.

20
 
to >
17.0
 pts
Excellent
The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.

17
 
to >
15.0
 pts
Good
The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.

15
 
to >
13.0
 pts
Fair
The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.

13
 
to >
0
 pts
Poor
The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.

20
 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful?How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your selection.

25
 
to >
22.0
 pts
Excellent
The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.

22
 
to >
19.0
 pts
Good
The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. …Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. …Identification and justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is included.

19
 
to >
17.0
 pts
Fair
The identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is most helpful. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.

17
 
to >
0
 pts
Poor
Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing. …Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing. …Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing.

25
 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part 3: Fact SheetBased on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues

30
 
to >
26.0
 pts
Excellent
Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

26
 
to >
23.0
 pts
Good
Creates an accurate fact sheet. …Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

23
 
to >
20.0
 pts
Fair
Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete. …Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response partially or inaccurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

20
 
to >
0
 pts
Poor
Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete. …Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. …Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing.

30
 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Resources

10
 
to >
8.0
 pts
Excellent
Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.

8
 
to >
7.0
 pts
Good
Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.

7
 
to >
6.0
 pts
Fair
Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.

6
 
to >
0
 pts
Poor
Response includes 2 or fewer resources.

10
 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Written Expression and Formatting: ParagraphParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5
 
to >
4.0
 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4
 
to >
3.0
 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3
 
to >
2.0
 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.

2
 
to >
0
 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. 5  pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. 5   to >
4.0
 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4
 
to >
3.0
 pts
Good
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3
 
to >
2.0
 pts
Fair
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2
 
to >
0
 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5
 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. Walden University NURS-6050 Week 2: Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet

5
 
to >
4.0
 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4
 
to >
3.0
 pts
Good
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3
 
to >
2.0
 pts
Fair
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

2
 
to >
0
 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥5) APA format errors.

5
 pts

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *