[Solved] DUE 6/6

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

see attached

**files (4)**

– ## CaseStudyGovernmentalRelationsinUrbanPlanningAssignmentInstructions.docx

– ## CaseStudyGradingRubric3.pdf

– ProfessionalEthicsandBeyondValuesinPlanning.pdf
– PlanningExperienceandPlannersEthics.pdf

**## CaseStudyGovernmentalRelationsinUrbanPlanningAssignmentInstructions.docx**

PADM 708

**Case Study: Governmental Relations in Urban Planning Assignment Instructions**

Overview

This case study assignment is designed to test your ability to conduct effective research, gain a nuanced understanding of complex concepts, synthesize the ideas reflected in your research with those reflected in your required readings, and to evaluate and apply these ideas to an issue of urban planning.

Instructions

For this Case Study, you will first describe two forms of local governments in the U.S. (e.g., city, towns, county, special governments) and their effect on planning. Consult ICMA for forms of local government. From there, you will analyze how the two forms of local government you selected use the planning process, and describe which comprehensive or incremental planning technique was chosen? What were the outcomes? Finally, you will determine a biblical viewpoint with the methodology chosen. Please use scripture to support the position. Integrate Biblical verses rather than at the end of the paper. Items to include are outlined as follows:

· Length of assignment is 2,000 – 2,500-words (8 – 10-pages)

· not including title page, reference page, and any appendices.

· Format of assignment: APA format with 1-inch margins, 12-pt. Times New Roman font, and must include a title page and reference page.

· Number of citations: 8 – 10 scholarly sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and Biblical reference) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. These must be cited in accordance with APA guidelines.

· Acceptable sources: Use scholarly sources only. No websites, podcasts, dictionaries, encyclopedias, or magazines.
**Peer reviewed journal articles, dissertations, and textbooks only.**

This assignment includes a template titled,
**Case Study: Governmental Relations in Urban Planning Template**. This template lays out for you the organization of your paper by providing all sections titles and format to which they need to be included. Use this template to accurately complete this assignment.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

This is a doctoral-level research assignment designed to test your ability to conduct effective research, gain a nuanced understanding of complex concepts, synthesize the ideas reflected in your research with those reflected in your required readings, and to evaluate and apply these ideas to an issue of urban planning.

As with all doctoral-level assignments, you are expected to comport yourself with the highest writing, research, and ethical standards. To do well on this assignment, you must conduct high-quality research and offer a rich, well-supported analysis; mere opinion or conjecture will not suffice. A doctoral level course requires description and analysis. While descriptions certainly are the precursor to analyses, they are not the analyses. Analysis is not just opinion statements, or a list of what authors have said. Each idea needs elaboration and explanation and, if possible, supported by data and/or credible sources. The analysis should demonstrate the ability to integrate theories with applications.

You must avoid careless or simple grammatical errors such as misspellings, incomplete sentences, comma splices, faulty noun/verb agreement, etc. Such errors will result in substantial point deductions. No slang, idioms, jargon, colloquialisms, and everyday language. Your writing must be scholarly.

Plagiarism in any form, including self-plagiarism, is strictly prohibited and may result in failure of the assignment, failure of the course, and/or removal from the program. It is your responsibility to ensure that you understand fully what constitutes the various forms of plagiarism and to avoid all forms of plagiarism. Consult the 2020-2021 LUO Honor Code.

**## CaseStudyGradingRubric3.pdf**

Criteria Ratings Points

Analysis and
Critique of
Material

30 to >26 pts

Advanced

All elements of the
assigned topic are
substantive, clearly, and
completely addressed in
light of the required page
count. Analyses flow in a
logical and effective
manner, address all
elements of the
assignment thoroughly,
and reach the nuances of
the issues raised.
Complex issues are
navigated with precision,
clarity, and detail.

26 to >22 pts

Proficient

Major elements of the
assigned topic are
discussed in a
meaningful way but
the paper would
benefit from additional
clarity, depth, or detail.
Analyses are generally
well constructed.
Complex issues are
recognized.

22 to >0 pts

Developing

Some elements of the
assigned topic are mentioned,
but the discussion is
incomplete, unclear,
superficial, or otherwise does
not meet expectations.
Analyses are general and
lacking in depth. Complex
issues and nuances are
overlooked.

0 pts

Not
Present

30 pts

Organization 24 to >21 pts

Advanced

The paper is focused and
well organized. The
paper has a clear thesis,
and a clear and
substantive introduction
and conclusion. The
paper effectively uses
headings and
subheadings as
appropriate to focus on
and deepen analyses.

21 to >18 pts

Proficient

The paper is
reasonably well
organized and follows
a logical path from
idea to idea and
section to section. The
paper includes an
adequate introduction
and conclusion.

18 to >0 pts

Developing

The paper is in need of
additional organization and
clarity. Ideas and/or sections of
the paper either do not flow
logically or are in need of
fundamental improvement. The
paper lacks an adequate
introduction and/or conclusion.

0 pts

Not
Present

24 pts

Critique,
Evaluation,
Synthesis,
and
Adequate
Use of
Sources

30 to >26 pts

Advanced

Sources, concepts, and
ideas are critically
evaluated and
synthesized in a manner
that moves beyond
restatement and makes a
valuable contribution to
the assigned topic.

26 to >22 pts

Proficient

Sources are used
correctly and support
the paper’s analyses
and conclusions.
Concepts and ideas
are understood and
linked in a reasonable
way that supports the
paper’s conclusions.
Paper reflects a good
familiarity with the
major ideas but would
benefit from greater
critique, evaluation,
and syntheses.

22 to >0 pts

Developing

Some sources are used but
are not critically evaluated
and/or not used in an effective
manner. The paper would
benefit from more substantive
use of sources, more
appropriate reliance on
sources, and/or better skill in
evaluating, synthesizing, or
applying ideas, concepts, or
sources.

0 pts

Not
Present

30 pts

Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM708_B02_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Mechanics 12 to >10 pts

Advanced

No grammar, spelling, or
punctuation errors are
present. The writing style
is precise and word
choice is appropriate.
Paper is 8 – 10 pages.

10 to >8 pts

Proficient

Few grammar,
spelling, or
punctuation errors are
present. Writing is
sufficient and word
choice is adequate.
Paper is 6 – 8 pages.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Several grammar, spelling, or
punctuation errors are present.
The writing style is
understandable but could be
improved. Word choice is
generally good. Paper does
not meet the length
requirement.

0 pts

Not
Present

12 pts

Current APA
Format
Elements

12 to >10 pts

Advanced

Citations and format are
in the current APA style.
Title page, bibliography,
etc. are correctly
formatted. Paper is
double-spaced with
1-inch margins and
written in 12-point Times
New Roman font. The
paper is properly
formatted and of high
quality.

10 to >8 pts

Proficient

Citations and format
are in the current APA
style with few errors.
Title page,
bibliography, etc. are
present with few
errors. Paper is
double-spaced with
1-inch margins and
written in 12 point
Times New Roman
font. The paper is
properly formatted and
of acceptable quality.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Citations and format are in the
current APA style, though
several errors are present.
Title page, bibliography, etc.,
are included, though several
errors are present. Paper is
double-spaced, but margins or
fonts are incorrect. The paper
is acceptably formatted.

0 pts

Not
Present

12 pts

Research
Elements

12 to >10 pts

Advanced

High quality primary and
secondary sources are
utilized in a mature and
effective manner.
Research effectively
incorporates multiple
nuanced viewpoints of
complex issues. At least
8 – 10 sources are used,
in addition to the course
text and the Bible. A
complete and accurate
bibliography is provided.
Arguments are correctly
and effectively supported
by research.

10 to >8 pts

Proficient

Primary and
secondary sources of
acceptable and
appropriate nature and
quality are utilized.
Research reflects
multiple viewpoints of
complex issues. At
least 6 – 8 sources are
used, in addition to the
course text and the
Bible. A complete and
accurate bibliography
is provided. Arguments
are acceptably
supported by research.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Fewer than 4 primary and
secondary sources of
acceptable and appropriate
nature and quality are utilized.
Research does not reflect
multiple viewpoints of complex
issues. An incomplete or
inaccurate bibliography is
provided. Arguments are only
tangentially supported by
research. Arguments
incorporate research, but often
include or rely upon personal
opinion without appropriate
support. Sources are used
inappropriately at times.

0 pts

No
Marks

12 pts

Total Points: 120

Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM708_B02_202630

**ProfessionalEthicsandBeyondValuesinPlanning.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professionalethicsandbeyondvaluesinplanning-pdf-10556369)

**PlanningExperienceandPlannersEthics.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/planningexperienceandplannersethics-pdf-10556367)

**PlanningExperienceandPlannersEthics.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/planningexperienceandplannersethics-pdf-10556367)

**## CaseStudyGovernmentalRelationsinUrbanPlanningAssignmentInstructions.docx**

PADM 708

**Case Study: Governmental Relations in Urban Planning Assignment Instructions**

Overview

This case study assignment is designed to test your ability to conduct effective research, gain a nuanced understanding of complex concepts, synthesize the ideas reflected in your research with those reflected in your required readings, and to evaluate and apply these ideas to an issue of urban planning.

Instructions

For this Case Study, you will first describe two forms of local governments in the U.S. (e.g., city, towns, county, special governments) and their effect on planning. Consult ICMA for forms of local government. From there, you will analyze how the two forms of local government you selected use the planning process, and describe which comprehensive or incremental planning technique was chosen? What were the outcomes? Finally, you will determine a biblical viewpoint with the methodology chosen. Please use scripture to support the position. Integrate Biblical verses rather than at the end of the paper. Items to include are outlined as follows:

· Length of assignment is 2,000 – 2,500-words (8 – 10-pages)

· not including title page, reference page, and any appendices.

· Format of assignment: APA format with 1-inch margins, 12-pt. Times New Roman font, and must include a title page and reference page.

· Number of citations: 8 – 10 scholarly sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and Biblical reference) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. These must be cited in accordance with APA guidelines.

· Acceptable sources: Use scholarly sources only. No websites, podcasts, dictionaries, encyclopedias, or magazines.
**Peer reviewed journal articles, dissertations, and textbooks only.**

This assignment includes a template titled,
**Case Study: Governmental Relations in Urban Planning Template**. This template lays out for you the organization of your paper by providing all sections titles and format to which they need to be included. Use this template to accurately complete this assignment.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

This is a doctoral-level research assignment designed to test your ability to conduct effective research, gain a nuanced understanding of complex concepts, synthesize the ideas reflected in your research with those reflected in your required readings, and to evaluate and apply these ideas to an issue of urban planning.

As with all doctoral-level assignments, you are expected to comport yourself with the highest writing, research, and ethical standards. To do well on this assignment, you must conduct high-quality research and offer a rich, well-supported analysis; mere opinion or conjecture will not suffice. A doctoral level course requires description and analysis. While descriptions certainly are the precursor to analyses, they are not the analyses. Analysis is not just opinion statements, or a list of what authors have said. Each idea needs elaboration and explanation and, if possible, supported by data and/or credible sources. The analysis should demonstrate the ability to integrate theories with applications.

You must avoid careless or simple grammatical errors such as misspellings, incomplete sentences, comma splices, faulty noun/verb agreement, etc. Such errors will result in substantial point deductions. No slang, idioms, jargon, colloquialisms, and everyday language. Your writing must be scholarly.

Plagiarism in any form, including self-plagiarism, is strictly prohibited and may result in failure of the assignment, failure of the course, and/or removal from the program. It is your responsibility to ensure that you understand fully what constitutes the various forms of plagiarism and to avoid all forms of plagiarism. Consult the 2020-2021 LUO Honor Code.

**## CaseStudyGradingRubric3.pdf**

Criteria Ratings Points

Analysis and
Critique of
Material

30 to >26 pts

Advanced

All elements of the
assigned topic are
substantive, clearly, and
completely addressed in
light of the required page
count. Analyses flow in a
logical and effective
manner, address all
elements of the
assignment thoroughly,
and reach the nuances of
the issues raised.
Complex issues are
navigated with precision,
clarity, and detail.

26 to >22 pts

Proficient

Major elements of the
assigned topic are
discussed in a
meaningful way but
the paper would
benefit from additional
clarity, depth, or detail.
Analyses are generally
well constructed.
Complex issues are
recognized.

22 to >0 pts

Developing

Some elements of the
assigned topic are mentioned,
but the discussion is
incomplete, unclear,
superficial, or otherwise does
not meet expectations.
Analyses are general and
lacking in depth. Complex
issues and nuances are
overlooked.

0 pts

Not
Present

30 pts

Organization 24 to >21 pts

Advanced

The paper is focused and
well organized. The
paper has a clear thesis,
and a clear and
substantive introduction
and conclusion. The
paper effectively uses
headings and
subheadings as
appropriate to focus on
and deepen analyses.

21 to >18 pts

Proficient

The paper is
reasonably well
organized and follows
a logical path from
idea to idea and
section to section. The
paper includes an
adequate introduction
and conclusion.

18 to >0 pts

Developing

The paper is in need of
additional organization and
clarity. Ideas and/or sections of
the paper either do not flow
logically or are in need of
fundamental improvement. The
paper lacks an adequate
introduction and/or conclusion.

0 pts

Not
Present

24 pts

Critique,
Evaluation,
Synthesis,
and
Adequate
Use of
Sources

30 to >26 pts

Advanced

Sources, concepts, and
ideas are critically
evaluated and
synthesized in a manner
that moves beyond
restatement and makes a
valuable contribution to
the assigned topic.

26 to >22 pts

Proficient

Sources are used
correctly and support
the paper’s analyses
and conclusions.
Concepts and ideas
are understood and
linked in a reasonable
way that supports the
paper’s conclusions.
Paper reflects a good
familiarity with the
major ideas but would
benefit from greater
critique, evaluation,
and syntheses.

22 to >0 pts

Developing

Some sources are used but
are not critically evaluated
and/or not used in an effective
manner. The paper would
benefit from more substantive
use of sources, more
appropriate reliance on
sources, and/or better skill in
evaluating, synthesizing, or
applying ideas, concepts, or
sources.

0 pts

Not
Present

30 pts

Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM708_B02_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Mechanics 12 to >10 pts

Advanced

No grammar, spelling, or
punctuation errors are
present. The writing style
is precise and word
choice is appropriate.
Paper is 8 – 10 pages.

10 to >8 pts

Proficient

Few grammar,
spelling, or
punctuation errors are
present. Writing is
sufficient and word
choice is adequate.
Paper is 6 – 8 pages.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Several grammar, spelling, or
punctuation errors are present.
The writing style is
understandable but could be
improved. Word choice is
generally good. Paper does
not meet the length
requirement.

0 pts

Not
Present

12 pts

Current APA
Format
Elements

12 to >10 pts

Advanced

Citations and format are
in the current APA style.
Title page, bibliography,
etc. are correctly
formatted. Paper is
double-spaced with
1-inch margins and
written in 12-point Times
New Roman font. The
paper is properly
formatted and of high
quality.

10 to >8 pts

Proficient

Citations and format
are in the current APA
style with few errors.
Title page,
bibliography, etc. are
present with few
errors. Paper is
double-spaced with
1-inch margins and
written in 12 point
Times New Roman
font. The paper is
properly formatted and
of acceptable quality.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Citations and format are in the
current APA style, though
several errors are present.
Title page, bibliography, etc.,
are included, though several
errors are present. Paper is
double-spaced, but margins or
fonts are incorrect. The paper
is acceptably formatted.

0 pts

Not
Present

12 pts

Research
Elements

12 to >10 pts

Advanced

High quality primary and
secondary sources are
utilized in a mature and
effective manner.
Research effectively
incorporates multiple
nuanced viewpoints of
complex issues. At least
8 – 10 sources are used,
in addition to the course
text and the Bible. A
complete and accurate
bibliography is provided.
Arguments are correctly
and effectively supported
by research.

10 to >8 pts

Proficient

Primary and
secondary sources of
acceptable and
appropriate nature and
quality are utilized.
Research reflects
multiple viewpoints of
complex issues. At
least 6 – 8 sources are
used, in addition to the
course text and the
Bible. A complete and
accurate bibliography
is provided. Arguments
are acceptably
supported by research.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Fewer than 4 primary and
secondary sources of
acceptable and appropriate
nature and quality are utilized.
Research does not reflect
multiple viewpoints of complex
issues. An incomplete or
inaccurate bibliography is
provided. Arguments are only
tangentially supported by
research. Arguments
incorporate research, but often
include or rely upon personal
opinion without appropriate
support. Sources are used
inappropriately at times.

0 pts

No
Marks

12 pts

Total Points: 120

Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM708_B02_202630

**ProfessionalEthicsandBeyondValuesinPlanning.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professionalethicsandbeyondvaluesinplanning-pdf-10556369)

**PlanningExperienceandPlannersEthics.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/planningexperienceandplannersethics-pdf-10556367)

**## CaseStudyGovernmentalRelationsinUrbanPlanningAssignmentInstructions.docx**

PADM 708

**Case Study: Governmental Relations in Urban Planning Assignment Instructions**

Overview

This case study assignment is designed to test your ability to conduct effective research, gain a nuanced understanding of complex concepts, synthesize the ideas reflected in your research with those reflected in your required readings, and to evaluate and apply these ideas to an issue of urban planning.

Instructions

For this Case Study, you will first describe two forms of local governments in the U.S. (e.g., city, towns, county, special governments) and their effect on planning. Consult ICMA for forms of local government. From there, you will analyze how the two forms of local government you selected use the planning process, and describe which comprehensive or incremental planning technique was chosen? What were the outcomes? Finally, you will determine a biblical viewpoint with the methodology chosen. Please use scripture to support the position. Integrate Biblical verses rather than at the end of the paper. Items to include are outlined as follows:

· Length of assignment is 2,000 – 2,500-words (8 – 10-pages)

· not including title page, reference page, and any appendices.

· Format of assignment: APA format with 1-inch margins, 12-pt. Times New Roman font, and must include a title page and reference page.

· Number of citations: 8 – 10 scholarly sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and Biblical reference) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. These must be cited in accordance with APA guidelines.

· Acceptable sources: Use scholarly sources only. No websites, podcasts, dictionaries, encyclopedias, or magazines.
**Peer reviewed journal articles, dissertations, and textbooks only.**

This assignment includes a template titled,
**Case Study: Governmental Relations in Urban Planning Template**. This template lays out for you the organization of your paper by providing all sections titles and format to which they need to be included. Use this template to accurately complete this assignment.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

This is a doctoral-level research assignment designed to test your ability to conduct effective research, gain a nuanced understanding of complex concepts, synthesize the ideas reflected in your research with those reflected in your required readings, and to evaluate and apply these ideas to an issue of urban planning.

As with all doctoral-level assignments, you are expected to comport yourself with the highest writing, research, and ethical standards. To do well on this assignment, you must conduct high-quality research and offer a rich, well-supported analysis; mere opinion or conjecture will not suffice. A doctoral level course requires description and analysis. While descriptions certainly are the precursor to analyses, they are not the analyses. Analysis is not just opinion statements, or a list of what authors have said. Each idea needs elaboration and explanation and, if possible, supported by data and/or credible sources. The analysis should demonstrate the ability to integrate theories with applications.

You must avoid careless or simple grammatical errors such as misspellings, incomplete sentences, comma splices, faulty noun/verb agreement, etc. Such errors will result in substantial point deductions. No slang, idioms, jargon, colloquialisms, and everyday language. Your writing must be scholarly.

Plagiarism in any form, including self-plagiarism, is strictly prohibited and may result in failure of the assignment, failure of the course, and/or removal from the program. It is your responsibility to ensure that you understand fully what constitutes the various forms of plagiarism and to avoid all forms of plagiarism. Consult the 2020-2021 LUO Honor Code.

**## CaseStudyGradingRubric3.pdf**

Criteria Ratings Points

Analysis and
Critique of
Material

30 to >26 pts

Advanced

All elements of the
assigned topic are
substantive, clearly, and
completely addressed in
light of the required page
count. Analyses flow in a
logical and effective
manner, address all
elements of the
assignment thoroughly,
and reach the nuances of
the issues raised.
Complex issues are
navigated with precision,
clarity, and detail.

26 to >22 pts

Proficient

Major elements of the
assigned topic are
discussed in a
meaningful way but
the paper would
benefit from additional
clarity, depth, or detail.
Analyses are generally
well constructed.
Complex issues are
recognized.

22 to >0 pts

Developing

Some elements of the
assigned topic are mentioned,
but the discussion is
incomplete, unclear,
superficial, or otherwise does
not meet expectations.
Analyses are general and
lacking in depth. Complex
issues and nuances are
overlooked.

0 pts

Not
Present

30 pts

Organization 24 to >21 pts

Advanced

The paper is focused and
well organized. The
paper has a clear thesis,
and a clear and
substantive introduction
and conclusion. The
paper effectively uses
headings and
subheadings as
appropriate to focus on
and deepen analyses.

21 to >18 pts

Proficient

The paper is
reasonably well
organized and follows
a logical path from
idea to idea and
section to section. The
paper includes an
adequate introduction
and conclusion.

18 to >0 pts

Developing

The paper is in need of
additional organization and
clarity. Ideas and/or sections of
the paper either do not flow
logically or are in need of
fundamental improvement. The
paper lacks an adequate
introduction and/or conclusion.

0 pts

Not
Present

24 pts

Critique,
Evaluation,
Synthesis,
and
Adequate
Use of
Sources

30 to >26 pts

Advanced

Sources, concepts, and
ideas are critically
evaluated and
synthesized in a manner
that moves beyond
restatement and makes a
valuable contribution to
the assigned topic.

26 to >22 pts

Proficient

Sources are used
correctly and support
the paper’s analyses
and conclusions.
Concepts and ideas
are understood and
linked in a reasonable
way that supports the
paper’s conclusions.
Paper reflects a good
familiarity with the
major ideas but would
benefit from greater
critique, evaluation,
and syntheses.

22 to >0 pts

Developing

Some sources are used but
are not critically evaluated
and/or not used in an effective
manner. The paper would
benefit from more substantive
use of sources, more
appropriate reliance on
sources, and/or better skill in
evaluating, synthesizing, or
applying ideas, concepts, or
sources.

0 pts

Not
Present

30 pts

Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM708_B02_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Mechanics 12 to >10 pts

Advanced

No grammar, spelling, or
punctuation errors are
present. The writing style
is precise and word
choice is appropriate.
Paper is 8 – 10 pages.

10 to >8 pts

Proficient

Few grammar,
spelling, or
punctuation errors are
present. Writing is
sufficient and word
choice is adequate.
Paper is 6 – 8 pages.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Several grammar, spelling, or
punctuation errors are present.
The writing style is
understandable but could be
improved. Word choice is
generally good. Paper does
not meet the length
requirement.

0 pts

Not
Present

12 pts

Current APA
Format
Elements

12 to >10 pts

Advanced

Citations and format are
in the current APA style.
Title page, bibliography,
etc. are correctly
formatted. Paper is
double-spaced with
1-inch margins and
written in 12-point Times
New Roman font. The
paper is properly
formatted and of high
quality.

10 to >8 pts

Proficient

Citations and format
are in the current APA
style with few errors.
Title page,
bibliography, etc. are
present with few
errors. Paper is
double-spaced with
1-inch margins and
written in 12 point
Times New Roman
font. The paper is
properly formatted and
of acceptable quality.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Citations and format are in the
current APA style, though
several errors are present.
Title page, bibliography, etc.,
are included, though several
errors are present. Paper is
double-spaced, but margins or
fonts are incorrect. The paper
is acceptably formatted.

0 pts

Not
Present

12 pts

Research
Elements

12 to >10 pts

Advanced

High quality primary and
secondary sources are
utilized in a mature and
effective manner.
Research effectively
incorporates multiple
nuanced viewpoints of
complex issues. At least
8 – 10 sources are used,
in addition to the course
text and the Bible. A
complete and accurate
bibliography is provided.
Arguments are correctly
and effectively supported
by research.

10 to >8 pts

Proficient

Primary and
secondary sources of
acceptable and
appropriate nature and
quality are utilized.
Research reflects
multiple viewpoints of
complex issues. At
least 6 – 8 sources are
used, in addition to the
course text and the
Bible. A complete and
accurate bibliography
is provided. Arguments
are acceptably
supported by research.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Fewer than 4 primary and
secondary sources of
acceptable and appropriate
nature and quality are utilized.
Research does not reflect
multiple viewpoints of complex
issues. An incomplete or
inaccurate bibliography is
provided. Arguments are only
tangentially supported by
research. Arguments
incorporate research, but often
include or rely upon personal
opinion without appropriate
support. Sources are used
inappropriately at times.

0 pts

No
Marks

12 pts

Total Points: 120

Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM708_B02_202630

**ProfessionalEthicsandBeyondValuesinPlanning.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professionalethicsandbeyondvaluesinplanning-pdf-10556369)

**PlanningExperienceandPlannersEthics.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/planningexperienceandplannersethics-pdf-10556367)