Back to Module 3: Psychopharmacology for Anxiety and Neurocognitive Disorders
Assignment: Patient Case Scenario: Debate Podcast
This week, you will present and defend an assigned stance (pro or con) and specific medication for a patient case study scenario via podcast recording. Within the podcast, you will also share your perspective on why the alternative medication class would not be appropriate for the patient case scenario.
Support your answers with evidence-based, peer-reviewed scholarly literature.
Note
: APA style format with citations and references will apply.
As a reminder, these were the assigned medications:
Pro
Con
Amphetamine
Amphetamine
Methylphenidate
Methylphenidate
Alpha Adrenergic Agonist
Alpha Adrenergic Agonist
Non-Stimulant
Non-Stimulant
Level 2: AI for Study and Planning Support
AI use is
required
and is to be used for brainstorming, outlining, or studying
You are fully responsible for the final work
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this assessment.
Required Resources
To prepare:
Review the Required Learning Resources.
Review your research regarding your position and medication.
Consider how you will apply your specific position and medication to the presented patient case.
By Sunday of Week 6
Submit
a link to a 5-minute podcast for your selected concept, focusing on modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. You are welcome to be as creative as you want to be, but you should aim to be concise in your delivery. Remember, the more you understand the concept, the more concise you can be with your audience.
Additionally, you
must submit a completed AI Assessment Template
as part of your submission.
Submission Information – Podcast
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
MD3Assgn1PT1_LastName_FirstInitial
Then, click on
Start Assignment
near the top of the page.
Next, click on
Text Entry
tab, and add your Podcast link.
Next, agree to the End-User License Agreement.
Finally, select
Submit Assignment
for review.
Submission Information – AI Assessment Template
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
MD3Assgn1PT2_LastName_FirstInitial
Then, click on
Start Assignment
near the top of the page.
Next, click on
Upload File
and select
Submit Assignment
for review.
Rubric
NURS_6630_Module3_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_6630_Module3_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Shows Photo ID Displayed and Dressed ProfessionallyStudent
10
pts
Excellent
Photo ID is clearly displayed and faculty are able to identify the student. The student is dressed professionally with a lab coat.
0
pts
Poor
Photo ID is not clearly displayed (faculty cannot make out the student) or displayed at all. *Student must remedy this or grade will be a ZERO. The student is not dressed professionally with a lab coat.
10
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Podcast discusses student’s stance (either pro or con) on the medication to the presented patient case.
30
to >
26.82
pts
Excellent
Provides a fully developed discussion of the student’s medication and stance (either pro or con) to the presented patient case.
26.82
to >
23.82
pts
Good
Provides an adequately developed discussion of the student’s medication and stance (either pro or con) to the presented patient case.
23.82
to >
20.82
pts
Fair
Provides a minimally developed discussion of the student’s medication and stance (either pro or con) to the presented case.
20.82
to >
0
pts
Poor
Does not provide a discussion of the student’s medication and stance (either pro or con) to the presented case.
30
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Podcast is supported by evidence-based, peer reviewed scholarly articles and includes AI Submission details.
20
to >
17.88
pts
Excellent
Uses at least 3 evidence-based, peer-reviewed articles and includes AI submission details.
17.88
to >
15.88
pts
Good
Uses at least 2 evidence-based, peer-reviewed articles and includes AI submission details.
15.88
to >
13.88
pts
Fair
Uses 1 evidence-based, peer-reviewed article and AI submission details.
13.88
to >
0
pts
Poor
Does not use evidence-based, peer-reviewed articles and AI submission details may be missing or incomplete
20
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Professionalism
15
to >
13.41
pts
Excellent
The podcast is consistently professional, well-communicated, and easy to follow.
13.41
to >
11.91
pts
Good
The podcast is mostly professional, well-communicated, and easy to follow.
11.91
to >
10.41
pts
Fair
The podcast is minimally professional. Some parts are poorly communicated and difficult to follow.
10.41
to >
0
pts
Poor
The podcast is disorganized, unclear, or incomplete.
15
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Speaker Delivery
15
to >
13.41
pts
Excellent
Speaker delivery is consistently engaging and clear.
13.41
to >
11.91
pts
Good
Speaker delivery is mostly engaging and clear.
11.91
to >
10.41
pts
Fair
Speaker delivery is minimally engaging. Some sections lack clarity.
10.41
to >
0
pts
Poor
Speaker delivery is unclear or incomplete.
15
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Source Attribution and APA Formatting
5
to >
4.46
pts
Excellent
All sources are cited in APA format without any errors… All images from sources include proper attribution without APA formatting errors.
4.46
to >
3.96
pts
Good
All sources are cited in APA format with some minor errors… All images from sources include proper attribution with minor APA formatting errors.
3.96
to >
3.46
pts
Fair
All sources are cited with frequent APA formatting errors… All images from sources include improper attribution with frequent APA formatting errors.
3.46
to >
0
pts
Poor
Excludes source citations or shows minimal adherence to APA formatting rules… All images from sources lack attribution.
5
pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Time
5
pts
Excellent
The video does not exceed the 6-minute time limit.
3.46
pts
Poor
The video exceeds the 6-minute time limit. (Note: Information presented after the 6 minutes will not be evaluated for grade inclusion.)
5
pts
Total Points:
100
Leave a Reply