[Solved] 8-1 Project Three

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Please see attached below for assignment help details!

– ## CJ207ProjectThreeTemplate.docx

– ## ProjectThreeGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip

**## CJ207ProjectThreeTemplate.docx**


## CJ 207 Project Three Template

Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information.

### Mapp v. Ohio

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Gideon v. Wainwright

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Roper v. Simmons OR In re Gault

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

## image1.png

## image2.svg

**## ProjectThreeGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip**

## Project Three Guidelines and Rubric.html

## CJ 207 Project Three Guidelines and Rubric

### Competency

In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency:

– Analyze the impact of court decisions on criminal justice policy and professional practice

### Scenario

The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) recently recruited law enforcement professionals from around the world with the intent to resettle them in different communities around the United States in order to diversify local police forces. These professionals have a background in criminal justice practices, but they lack knowledge of specific U.S. criminal justice practices and need instruction in how specific U.S. Supreme Court cases dictate the actions of professionals in police, courts, and corrections. You have been asked to create materials that will be included in a handbook these professionals will use as a part of their onboarding.

### Directions

For your materials, you will summarize the decision of the identified court cases and explain the impact they have had on different policies, procedures, or practices in different branches of the criminal justice system.

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on police policies, procedures, or practices. In 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Mapp v. Ohio](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn87.xml)

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on court policies, procedures, or practices. In 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Gideon v. Wainwright](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn83.xml) (See Hemmens et al., p. 343–344)

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on corrections policies, procedures, or practices. In 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Furman v. Georgia](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn4.xml) and
[Gregg v. Georgia](https://law.jrank.org/pages/23537/Gregg-v-Georgia-Significance.html)

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on policies, procedures, or practices relating to juveniles. Choose one of the cases below, and in 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Roper v. Simmons](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fdownload%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn6.pdf)
– [In re Gault](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fdownload%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn85.pdf)

### What to Submit

To complete this project, you must submit the following:

Handbook training materials using the
[Project Three Template Word Document](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/course_documents/CJ%20207%20Project%20Three%20Template.docx).

### Supporting Materials

The following resource(s) may help support your work on the project:

[Project Three Template Word Document](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/course_documents/CJ%20207%20Project%20Three%20Template.docx)
This template should be used to create your handbook training materials.

### Project Three Rubric

| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (100%) | Meets Expectations (85%) | Partially Meets Expectations (55%) | Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) | Value |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Clear Communication | Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 15 |
| Police | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on police policies, procedures, or practices | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on police policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Courts | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on court policies, procedures, or practices | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on court policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Corrections | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on corrections policies, procedures, or practices | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on corrections policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Juveniles | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on policies, procedures, or practices related to juveniles | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of one of the identified cases on policies, procedures, or practices related to juveniles | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Citations and Attributions | Attributes sources where applicable using citation methods with very few minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution | Attributes sources where applicable, but with major errors | Does not attribute sources where applicable | 5 |
| Total: | 100% |

## course_documents/CJ 207 Project Three Template.docx


## CJ 207 Project Three Template

Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information.

### Mapp v. Ohio

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Gideon v. Wainwright

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Roper v. Simmons OR In re Gault

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

## image1.png

## image2.svg

**## ProjectThreeGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip**

## Project Three Guidelines and Rubric.html

## CJ 207 Project Three Guidelines and Rubric

### Competency

In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency:

– Analyze the impact of court decisions on criminal justice policy and professional practice

### Scenario

The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) recently recruited law enforcement professionals from around the world with the intent to resettle them in different communities around the United States in order to diversify local police forces. These professionals have a background in criminal justice practices, but they lack knowledge of specific U.S. criminal justice practices and need instruction in how specific U.S. Supreme Court cases dictate the actions of professionals in police, courts, and corrections. You have been asked to create materials that will be included in a handbook these professionals will use as a part of their onboarding.

### Directions

For your materials, you will summarize the decision of the identified court cases and explain the impact they have had on different policies, procedures, or practices in different branches of the criminal justice system.

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on police policies, procedures, or practices. In 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Mapp v. Ohio](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn87.xml)

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on court policies, procedures, or practices. In 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Gideon v. Wainwright](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn83.xml) (See Hemmens et al., p. 343–344)

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on corrections policies, procedures, or practices. In 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Furman v. Georgia](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn4.xml) and
[Gregg v. Georgia](https://law.jrank.org/pages/23537/Gregg-v-Georgia-Significance.html)

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on policies, procedures, or practices relating to juveniles. Choose one of the cases below, and in 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Roper v. Simmons](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fdownload%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn6.pdf)
– [In re Gault](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fdownload%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn85.pdf)

### What to Submit

To complete this project, you must submit the following:

Handbook training materials using the
[Project Three Template Word Document](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/course_documents/CJ%20207%20Project%20Three%20Template.docx).

### Supporting Materials

The following resource(s) may help support your work on the project:

[Project Three Template Word Document](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/course_documents/CJ%20207%20Project%20Three%20Template.docx)
This template should be used to create your handbook training materials.

### Project Three Rubric

| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (100%) | Meets Expectations (85%) | Partially Meets Expectations (55%) | Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) | Value |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Clear Communication | Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 15 |
| Police | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on police policies, procedures, or practices | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on police policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Courts | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on court policies, procedures, or practices | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on court policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Corrections | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on corrections policies, procedures, or practices | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on corrections policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Juveniles | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on policies, procedures, or practices related to juveniles | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of one of the identified cases on policies, procedures, or practices related to juveniles | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Citations and Attributions | Attributes sources where applicable using citation methods with very few minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution | Attributes sources where applicable, but with major errors | Does not attribute sources where applicable | 5 |
| Total: | 100% |

## course_documents/CJ 207 Project Three Template.docx


## CJ 207 Project Three Template

Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information.

### Mapp v. Ohio

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Gideon v. Wainwright

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Roper v. Simmons OR In re Gault

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

## image1.png

## image2.svg

**## CJ207ProjectThreeTemplate.docx**


## CJ 207 Project Three Template

Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information.

### Mapp v. Ohio

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Gideon v. Wainwright

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Roper v. Simmons OR In re Gault

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

## image1.png

## image2.svg

**## ProjectThreeGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip**

## Project Three Guidelines and Rubric.html

## CJ 207 Project Three Guidelines and Rubric

### Competency

In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency:

– Analyze the impact of court decisions on criminal justice policy and professional practice

### Scenario

The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) recently recruited law enforcement professionals from around the world with the intent to resettle them in different communities around the United States in order to diversify local police forces. These professionals have a background in criminal justice practices, but they lack knowledge of specific U.S. criminal justice practices and need instruction in how specific U.S. Supreme Court cases dictate the actions of professionals in police, courts, and corrections. You have been asked to create materials that will be included in a handbook these professionals will use as a part of their onboarding.

### Directions

For your materials, you will summarize the decision of the identified court cases and explain the impact they have had on different policies, procedures, or practices in different branches of the criminal justice system.

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on police policies, procedures, or practices. In 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Mapp v. Ohio](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn87.xml)

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on court policies, procedures, or practices. In 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Gideon v. Wainwright](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn83.xml) (See Hemmens et al., p. 343–344)

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on corrections policies, procedures, or practices. In 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Furman v. Georgia](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn4.xml) and
[Gregg v. Georgia](https://law.jrank.org/pages/23537/Gregg-v-Georgia-Significance.html)

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on policies, procedures, or practices relating to juveniles. Choose one of the cases below, and in 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Roper v. Simmons](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fdownload%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn6.pdf)
– [In re Gault](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fdownload%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn85.pdf)

### What to Submit

To complete this project, you must submit the following:

Handbook training materials using the
[Project Three Template Word Document](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/course_documents/CJ%20207%20Project%20Three%20Template.docx).

### Supporting Materials

The following resource(s) may help support your work on the project:

[Project Three Template Word Document](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/course_documents/CJ%20207%20Project%20Three%20Template.docx)
This template should be used to create your handbook training materials.

### Project Three Rubric

| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (100%) | Meets Expectations (85%) | Partially Meets Expectations (55%) | Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) | Value |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Clear Communication | Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 15 |
| Police | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on police policies, procedures, or practices | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on police policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Courts | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on court policies, procedures, or practices | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on court policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Corrections | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on corrections policies, procedures, or practices | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on corrections policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Juveniles | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on policies, procedures, or practices related to juveniles | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of one of the identified cases on policies, procedures, or practices related to juveniles | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Citations and Attributions | Attributes sources where applicable using citation methods with very few minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution | Attributes sources where applicable, but with major errors | Does not attribute sources where applicable | 5 |
| Total: | 100% |

## course_documents/CJ 207 Project Three Template.docx


## CJ 207 Project Three Template

Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information.

### Mapp v. Ohio

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Gideon v. Wainwright

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Roper v. Simmons OR In re Gault

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

## image1.png

## image2.svg

**## CJ207ProjectThreeTemplate.docx**


## CJ 207 Project Three Template

Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information.

### Mapp v. Ohio

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Gideon v. Wainwright

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Roper v. Simmons OR In re Gault

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

## image1.png

## image2.svg

**## ProjectThreeGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip**

## Project Three Guidelines and Rubric.html

## CJ 207 Project Three Guidelines and Rubric

### Competency

In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency:

– Analyze the impact of court decisions on criminal justice policy and professional practice

### Scenario

The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) recently recruited law enforcement professionals from around the world with the intent to resettle them in different communities around the United States in order to diversify local police forces. These professionals have a background in criminal justice practices, but they lack knowledge of specific U.S. criminal justice practices and need instruction in how specific U.S. Supreme Court cases dictate the actions of professionals in police, courts, and corrections. You have been asked to create materials that will be included in a handbook these professionals will use as a part of their onboarding.

### Directions

For your materials, you will summarize the decision of the identified court cases and explain the impact they have had on different policies, procedures, or practices in different branches of the criminal justice system.

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on police policies, procedures, or practices. In 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Mapp v. Ohio](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn87.xml)

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on court policies, procedures, or practices. In 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Gideon v. Wainwright](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn83.xml) (See Hemmens et al., p. 343–344)

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on corrections policies, procedures, or practices. In 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Furman v. Georgia](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn4.xml) and
[Gregg v. Georgia](https://law.jrank.org/pages/23537/Gregg-v-Georgia-Significance.html)

– Analyze what impact these landmark cases have had on policies, procedures, or practices relating to juveniles. Choose one of the cases below, and in 50–75 words, summarize the decision. Then, in 150–300 words, explain the impact of the case:

– [Roper v. Simmons](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fdownload%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn6.pdf)
– [In re Gault](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Fdownload%2Fillustrated-great-decisions-of-the-supreme-court-2e%2Fn85.pdf)

### What to Submit

To complete this project, you must submit the following:

Handbook training materials using the
[Project Three Template Word Document](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/course_documents/CJ%20207%20Project%20Three%20Template.docx).

### Supporting Materials

The following resource(s) may help support your work on the project:

[Project Three Template Word Document](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/course_documents/CJ%20207%20Project%20Three%20Template.docx)
This template should be used to create your handbook training materials.

### Project Three Rubric

| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (100%) | Meets Expectations (85%) | Partially Meets Expectations (55%) | Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) | Value |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Clear Communication | Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 15 |
| Police | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on police policies, procedures, or practices | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on police policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Courts | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on court policies, procedures, or practices | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on court policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Corrections | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on corrections policies, procedures, or practices | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of the identified case on corrections policies, procedures, or practices | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Juveniles | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Analyzes the impact of landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases on policies, procedures, or practices related to juveniles | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing an analysis that clearly shows the impact of one of the identified cases on policies, procedures, or practices related to juveniles | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Citations and Attributions | Attributes sources where applicable using citation methods with very few minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution | Attributes sources where applicable, but with major errors | Does not attribute sources where applicable | 5 |
| Total: | 100% |

## course_documents/CJ 207 Project Three Template.docx


## CJ 207 Project Three Template

Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information.

### Mapp v. Ohio

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Gideon v. Wainwright

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

### Roper v. Simmons OR In re Gault

| | |
| — | — |
| **Summary** | **Impact of the Case** |
| [Insert text.] | [Insert text.] |

## image1.png

## image2.svg

– 1
– 2